Ruminations On Song SelectionThe songs included in
High Ground range from my own contemporary songs to older traditional ballads and tunes. What unites them is that they've been part of my repertoire over several decades. But are they too different from each other to include on a single CD?
One of my live performance heroes has always been Michael Cooney. I once saw him one night of a four-night stint at the "Main Line" coffeehouse in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania. He was doing three sets a night, and apologized for repeating a song he'd sung
two nights earlier in one set. He was sometimes called the one-man folk festival, due to the number of songs and range of styles that he performed.
I'm certainly no Michael Cooney, but one thing I picked up from him was a love of many different kinds of folk music, and this makes it a little difficult for me to identify myself with a single style of genre of folk music.
I'm not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing (or just a thing). When I put together a set of songs, I may include British ballads from the 17th Century (or faux versions of same that I wrote), bluegrass, Celtic tunes, my own singer-songwriter allegory, Woody Guthrie songs, humorous music hall numbers, or songs by contemporary folk songwriters.
The risk, I suppose, is not finding a consistent audience. This has never been a problem for me in the past, since most of my singing has traditionally been at folk song society events, where the audience by self-selection is interested in a wide range of folk material. But how does it play at the modern Open Mike, where even the feature only gets eight to ten songs, and individual open mikers one or two? I may come across as a bluegrass player one week, a traditional ballad singer another night, a contemporary the next. Is this a problem, or an asset? Do folk singers outside of the comfort zone of the folk song society need a genre?
I'll be finding out as I continue to try different open mikes in the area.